We have officially completed 8 weeks of the 2010 South Dakota Legislative Session! Next week marks the final week of session and will culminate with legislators debating and ultimately passing the General Appropriations fiscal year 2011 budget on Friday, March 12.
Budget Plan
On Friday, my GOP colleagues and I unveiled our list of proposed cuts to balance the fiscal year 2011 budget. This has been a long process for all of us as we have worked diligently with members of the House-Senate Joint Appropriations committee to identify $40 million + worth of cuts to state government departments, programs and other entities.
I believe the Republicans in the legislature have taken the right approach during the legislative session regarding tackling our budget deficit. With programs and personnel subject to being cut, it is absolutely paramount that this process be done in a thorough and responsible manner over the duration of the entire legislative session. I also believe strongly that our goal to balance the FY 2011 budget without using reserves is the right path to take. Early projections show our fiscal situation to be much more dire in fiscal year 2012 so we need to save our reserve money for next year when we will need to use it.
It is important to note that all these cuts are not final as we will be working next week with our Democrat colleagues in the legislature and the Governor’s office to hammer out a final list which will be included in the General Appropriations legislation. I plan on discussing these cuts with constituents over the weekend and taking their feedback with me to Pierre next week.
Here are the list of cuts:
Dollar/Cuts/Department
$150,000/Legislative travel/Legislature
$200,000/Board of Regents inter-state compact participation/Board of Regents
$300,000/Drug Court/Judiciary
$1,700,000/Intensive Meth Treatment Program/Corrections
$300,000/Dakota Digital Network tech reduction/Bureau of Information & Telecommunications
$265,000/BOR university consortium/Board of Regents
$2,300,000/Tobacco prevention/Department of Health
$970,000/PhD program in physics/Board of Regents
$770,000/Student tech fellows/Board of Regents
$660,000/School for the Deaf/Board of Regents
$100,000/State Fair/Department of Agriculture
$500,000/Education Service Agencies/Department of Education
$1,000,000/Tourism & State Development/Tourism & State Development
$400,000/Co-op Extension Service/Board of Regents
$500,000/Agriculture Experiment Station/Board of Regents
$6,500,000/Federal Medicaid clawback/Department of Social Services
$4,000,000/Excess personal services/All
$4,000,000/Capital expenditures, travel, supplies/All
$7,000,000/2 percent across-the-board cut, excluding K-12 education and Medicaid/All
$11,500,000/Large project refund reform
$43,115,000 Subtotal
$2,700,000/Projected tech school enrollment decline/Board of Regents
$500,000/Game Fish & Parks parks division/Department of Game, FIsh & Parks
$800,000/School consolidation incentives/Department of Education
$3,500,000/Change to growing enrollment program in K-12 funding formula/Department of Education
$2,000,000/Potential other funding sources for South Dakota Opportunity Scholarship/Board of Regents
$52,615,000 Total
Committee Action
We had some very significant debate on important legislation in both the Education and Judiciary committees this week.
In the Education committee, we heard testimony on Senate Bill 124 which is the legislation that seeks to change the index factor for K-12 education and also ties increases in K-12 education with increases in state government general fund revenue. I am a strong proponent of this approach because I continue to believe it is the most responsible method to allocate funding for K-12 education. Simply put, during years when state government revenues are growing, K-12 education will get more of the share of funding. During years when state government general fund revenues do not grow, K-12 will share in some of the sacrifices. I believe that this legislation will, in the long run, provide more funding for K-12 schools and also help us during the lean economic years in South Dakota.
I was very disappointed that SB 124 was amended in committee and passed in a manner that changes the complexion of the bill. I will be joining a group of legislators that will try to amend SB 124 back to its original form on the House floor on Monday. Stay tuned!
We also passed SB 12 this week in the House Judiciary committee. Senate Bill 12 is the highly publicized legislation that reforms the sex-offender registry list in South Dakota by creating three “tiers” of lists on the registry. The first “tier” includes a list of offenses where someone on the registry could request to petition off the registry after 10 years. The second “tier” includes a list of offenses where someone on the registry could request to petition off the registry after 25 years. The third “tier” includes a list of offenses (including all offenses where children were the victim) where someone on the registry would be on their for life. It is important to note that it is NOT a slam dunk that offenders will be automatically off the list. This bill just provides for them a petition process to make their case to get off the list. I believe these are equitable changes to the sex offender registry list.
Personal Bills
I’m happy to report that HB 1206 (my bill involving life insurance contestability provisions in the event of fraud) is on its way to the Governor’s desk to be signed into law! I’m also happy to report that two of my other bills that I primed on the House side (SB 156 & SB 97) are going to the House floor on Monday for debate after passing out of committees this week.
Senate Bill 156 is a bill that ensures that BOTH juvenile and adult drug convictions get reported to South Dakota schools and the South Dakota High School Activities Association. Currently, the Unified Judicial System is only mandated by statute to report juvenile violations. This means that an 18 or 19 year old who is participating in high school activities and gets charged with a drug offense could fall through the cracks in terms of being reported by the UJS to the schools.
Senate Bill 97 seeks to change salvage law by adding an extra definition on the title of a vehicle. Currently, if a vehicle is stolen and there is no damage to the vehicle, the title of the vehicle is still labeled as a salvage vehicle (even if there is no damage). One result of this is it lowers salvage value which is ultimately passed on to the insurance paying public. This legislation would simply add a definition of recovered theft, no damage to a title and incorporates an element of fairness involved to all sides.
Contact Information
Feel free to contact me anytime to discuss issues that are of importance to you. My e-mail address is rep.schlekeway@state.sd.us and my phone # is (605) 310-8600.
Have a great weekend!
Todd






